I think the weapons should get more powerful than this. I have fought alliance warriors with legendaries and of course, while the outcome is not pretty on a 1vs1 battle, I try and make sure there are friends behind me. Numbers, and coordination of those numbers, is what decides the outcome of a battle. I played WorldWar2 online for 2 years, and it was always numbers that made the difference. If the germans approached with Tiger Tanks (they kill anything with one shot, including the British heavily armored Matilda), we used player strategy to take em out. We had nothing that could assault a Tiger head-on, so we would painstakingly roll a 6lber ATG into a destroyed house or building, then blast it as when it turned to show it's weak sides. Or we used low flying bombers or Thunderbolts to take them out. With 2 or 3 players hitting it, it went down rather quickly. Same as this game, until we catch up. The difference is, this game is red team vs blue team. In WW2 Online, there was no such thing, they had equipment you didn't have.
Rel
The 2 or 3 players on one is a good stratgety. Only problem is, we don't have 2 or 3 players for every one of them. They have 2 or 3 for every one of us. What do we do when not only outgunned, but outmanned as well?
I should have mentioned that we were outmanned as well. I remember how they isolated towns. Many times they overran us, but that was the goal of the game.
This game spares us that, and many players don't even want to pvp. If it happens, we will rally and fight and they will lose. =)
Rel